Suburb · ACT · 2025 data

Parkes, ACT

In 2025, police recorded 97 offences in Parkes.

3.1 km²
Not ranked

Parkes has too few residents. Below 300, a few incidents swing the per-person rate wildly, so we show counts but don't rank it.

All offences
97
2025
Crimes / 1,000
—
ACT avg 35.1
Violent / 1,000
—
6 offences · avg 3.8
Property / 1,000
—
26 offences · avg 12.4

Top crime types, 2025

Transport regulation offences
48
Miscellaneous offences
17
Theft
14
Property damage
7
Assault and related offences
6
Burglary/Break and enter
3
Motor Vehicle Theft
2

Trend

TotalViolentPropertydashed = projection
091182202120222023202420252026

Recorded offences per year. Projection is a simple linear trend, not a forecast of individual risk.

Vs state & national

per 1,000 residents
ParkesState
All offences
Parkes
—
State
35.1
Violent
Parkes
—
State
3.8
Property
Parkes
—
State
12.4

Nearby suburbs

  1. Barton1.2 km 72 compare
  2. Russell1.4 km not ranked compare
  3. Capital Hill1.6 km not ranked compare
  4. Reid1.7 km 94 compare
  5. City1.8 km 99 compare
  6. Campbell2.1 km 16 compare
  7. Acton2.4 km 90 compare
  8. Kingston2.5 km 56 compare

Housing, rent and growth

Growth & new homes

ABS Regional Population · Building Approvals
MeasureValuevs other ACT areas
New homes approved, 12 months
12 months to Aug 2026
0 higher than 20%

ABS publishes these for larger areas: figures are for “Lake Burley Griffin”, which contains this suburb. Approvals are dwellings approved, not yet built. Growth and new supply are change indicators, not a price forecast.

Common questions about Parkes

Where does this data come from?

Official recorded-crime statistics published by state police and crime statistics agencies, divided by 2021 Census or ABS population estimates. See the methodology page for details.

Data notes

  • Population is estimated (medium confidence) from the ABS 2021 Census.
  • Recorded crime counts offences reported to or detected by police where they occurred. That includes offences against visitors and businesses, so busy centres score higher than their resident risk.
  • States classify offences differently, so ranks compare areas within the same state.